CO129-365 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1910 [1-3] — Page 281

276

«minum Aalbi: & avari od auotagrab bru eldæalvhent at 31 383

orið ehem rew nobjad gait # ti neve Jud ;iwoy Diiduq » mwob

mi egob si na swoi me ella evl? od bedoigizen od kivor gntown

nadyl of ofttend senord on st oxoff),ene weale meoalq tran!

■MBIJ A rid holdoundado eanor ont al beeq: wols to ¤iwid a bre

Jost mi, tall grey won at bol yuudalL3 woh sittent cutl

Jedze VAA of easeoul of yil Jon el di bre Ilm ɣIlmoiJOSTŲ

worla yIt3⁄4wen Ilir qan við de porteig A .Buodný. Muuto wie kaldu

evo il bas fwo wo sow diłw moiJuokrumateo to nyow Ingovat

yans ed hipow Jt eortentum a Dau negzeb Teen v newood quir: @1°

Offl .di evo b taeb as agutanovo olivout its 、Ji sonet of

11 motumuo. Ib qot reqo tel so yær 0.4% eno 91 · evovori reJJAU

been tri beroldonea si 2 40 3 emerfok nedtle to sinsotong ert

ed lit: Moidw Jongas Intomenit and wont ont beloof eď pino

.no medzi bourgoatb

*

.00

rid won Holdw & A 3 gol aemorine svida rodia wil

180 diundoqui eni od aeolo noitage of Bowie os al biswrot

- too gefod era ouerfi abgol xeor ne bre orgloonal to adner

wind IIlas bebivong 11 Jolla eni NOI A VIRO O&d hedounide

aneig on: .adobudnih antyal-juo movit moldaða erld of aTO): 104ABQ

-agis pola noi plutoi?twa nebivony was vrodenteique Haa eta

end od ecofu hrot orts de mmet 404 mold e gatosiq që

yawi tef arid cont De køjdo al ac0008 gbao IIIJNG code grotu

equado blurore ew fot: not duris donde va e oa fod max ni

.ed mole bua yldoonlb > amoros i

1

eave£tm

aboom 2013 to lindeb end erUoRib of bood on ni enoft

.II

-egits down enpaberi ba? «bood gift to Jerngnare ban gminie

redberg s de gidbog Jiodie orrerfoa wa od gommos sa huw adreU

od antis::01 ¥£no 41 bro nomodoe & I biegen we come inevnooni

*od suttu hvor dold uoltosido odd doem

•Driscono quiet dit to @tinefronel ert

alçazot e dit od Jobim foliw nolto@dony to dive art2

.zelq oria aldam

(4)

(4)

(0)

(0)

The cost involved in so doing.

(a)

The cost incurred in providing the siding to the Wharf

and Godown Company's premises.

(a)

The disposal of the lots to the North of Salisbury

Road in case resumption cannot be avoided. The question of land relinquishing in general

a view to a profitable leasing out.

with

(f)

(&)

Now as regards the lengthening of the Ferry Crossing the proposal involves an addition to half a mile to the present run thus converting the crossing to 11 minutes as against 7 at present. The time taken in the back shunt of Scheme 3 would occupy about the same time as it would take to run down to the atation in Scheme 1 but less than that which it would require to go to Scheme 2. This would be more than compensated for by saving of time in getting a train alongside the pier and in Scheme No.4 as giving direct access it would be so much time gained. The question is a small one but it is as well to meet the objection. On the other hand there is no question as to

the convenience of the proposal.

(b) It is possible that opinions are divided on this point,

It can be but I think the objection is one that should be met.

by placing a camber as shown on the plan and the extra cost can be justified by making the camber suitable for a deep sea wharf to which access can be given for Railway trucks going

alongside the steamers.

(c) In any case a new pier must be provided and whether at Nathan Road or at the site now proposed is immaterial as regards

the question of cost. The question of protection to it as increasing the cost is met in the paragraph above so that it need not be considered further here. As to who will pay for the

pier does not affect the question any more than that to be built at Bathan Road. If the Railway build it, Ferry Companys

using